Doctor Who Blog

Casting News via Time Vortex

New Doctor Who Companion, Sarah Jane Smith, to be played by Fawlty Towers’ APRIL WALKER!

Or so the headlines might have read back in 1973.

The secret is out…..according to SFX magazine.  Word has it that several days into rehearsals April Walker was dropped and a new Sarah Jane sought. Elizabeth Sladen apparently knew who the mystery actress was but kept the secret for over 35 years.  Good for her.   

“April Walker, apparently – not a household name, but an actress with a very heavily-populated CV including guest roles in everything from Dad’s Army and Terry And June to Judge John Deed and Waking The Dead. Here’s a clip of her playing Jean Wilson in the Fawlty Towers episode “The Wedding Party” (4m 45 secs in), and in The Two Ronnies.”

“Why was she replaced? Well, the story goes that Pertwee liked his Doctor to be a paternal, protective figure, and felt that his co-star should be young, petite and vulnerable (Sladen’s take on this was that Pertwee was the sort of man who “likes to impose themselves physically on smaller women”). Walker – tall and in her early ‘30s – didn’t fit the bill, as far as the star was concerned. And so her contract was cancelled.”

SFX ARTICLE

What would Doctor Who have been like with April Walker as Sarah Jane Smith?  Opposite Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker’s Doctor?  Would it have worked?  What of her stint in modern times as the hero of her own Sarah Jane Adventures?  Was it the character or the actress?  Or a singular synergy that made Sarah Jane so endurable? 

We will never know…

-Rod

6 Comments...

Not quite true, Rod in two respects…

1) Fawlty Towers didn’t air until 1977, so I doubt any headline in 1973 would have featured it.

2) Whoever April Walker was cast to play, it wasn’t quite Sarah Jane Smith. That’s also been stated in interviews in the past. She was cast as a companion, but Sarah came later in the process.

Posted by Graeme  on  01/09  at  11:53 PM

‘77!  Sorry….yeah ‘73 is Time Warrior. Mixed me dates. 

But it would have been a great headline….  drat.

Posted by Rod  on  01/10  at  01:12 AM

“Sarah Jane”, was practically all Elisabeth Sladen’s creation, with guidance, suggestions and script from Barry Letts, Terrance Dicks and Robert Holmes.

While any actress could have initially portrayed Sarah Jane, the ONLY actress who could have made “Sarah Jane” connect so powerfully to the WHO audience that the audience would never let go of her, was Elisabeth Sladen.  She had an unforgettable, heart-warming, feisty screen presense that was totally charming and absolutely unique.  She was the only actor capable of stealing the camera from Tom Baker, and Tom so adored her, that I don’t think he minded at all.

My intro to Doctor Who was ROBOT, on American PBS in the late 70’s.  I wasn’t impressed by Tom Baker in the first scenes I witnessed, but I couldn’t ignore the cute little brunette in the blue dress. There was SOMETHING about her.  Enchanted and charmed by “Sarah Jane” I continued to tune in show after show, until I grew to love the program, and even finally got used to Tom Baker!

To answer your question, it was the ACTRESS that made the character, and without Lis Sladen, Sarah Jane would be just another passing, dimly remembered companion.  Sarah Jane is unforgettable to 3 generations of WHO fans, because of Lis Sladen. That the internet came alive worldwide with grief upon news of her passing, and grandparents, parents and children were grief-stricken is testament to the powerful connection that Lis Sladen made to the audience as Sarah Jane. 

Lis Sladen’s audience may not have been as large as Liz Taylor’s, but I doubt any actress has been genuinely loved more than Lis Sladen was by the WHO audience.

Posted by Greg  on  01/10  at  05:33 PM

Fawlty Towers started in 1975, not 1977. So you’re both wrong! smile

Posted by Luca  on  01/11  at  09:09 AM

lnxqmyvj

Posted by efhjgsp  on  01/12  at  06:18 PM

jianubmw

Posted by fbjfupq  on  02/28  at  11:23 AM

Post a comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Recent Stories

Issue 166

The story goes on… (Special spin-off issue!): Torchwood! The Sarah Jane Adventures! K9: The Series! Plus:

  • Doctor Who‘s really quite good, isn’t it?
  • The Twin Dilemma revisited
  • News and reviews of Doctor Who books, DVDs, and audios

Issue 165

Tick, Tock (2011 season reviews conclude!): The final reviews of the 2011 season; or, the reviews of the final 2011 season. Plus:

  • Introducing a new series fan to classic episodes
  • The power of The Power of Kroll
  • News and reviews of Doctor Who books, DVDs, and audios

Issue 164

Rise And Fall (Spring 2011 season reviews): Enlightenment reviews the stories from Season… um, it’s 6.1 this year, right? Plus:

  • The quiet heroism of Rory Williams
  • In praise of an asexual Doctor
  • News and reviews of Doctor Who books, DVDs, and audios, including the Series Five box set!

Enlightenment Delays

We’ve had a number of queries from members regarding the delayed publication of Enlightenment this year. The DWIN Executive wants to share the following message concerning Enlightenment with DWIN members. Read more 

The Doctor, The Widow and the Wardrobe on Christmas Day on SPACE!

For the first time in Canada, the Doctor Who Christmas Special will actually air on Christmas Day! December 25 at 9pm


Is something broken? Let the webmaster know!

©Doctor Who Information Network (DWIN) 2009